Janalu Jeanes (Parchman)
US & Texas citizens,
We are being taken-advantage-of by counseled illegal aliens who have been told that they can apply for asylum in our country with their children in hand, if they simply show up at our border, as the border agents have been told by their president NOT TO enforce our immigration laws of entry.
People walking across our southern Texas border are being illegally admitted, since Biden is ignoring our law, and he should be immediately charged with that crime against US citizens. Why isn't he being charged? GOOD QUESTION FOR THE DEMOCRAT CITIZENS TO ANSWER! The migrants SHOULD be admitted only at ports-of-entry when they have children with them, not anywhere else. If they enter our country or our state of Texas at Del Rio, or the Brownsville area, or anywhere else that is not a designated port-of-entry, they are told by border agents who eventually pick them up, that if they return back over the border, their children WILL NOT BE SEPARATED from them. If they decide they do not want to go back, then THEY HAVE MADE THEIR CHOICE TO ALLOW THEIR CHILDREN TO GO TO A DIFFERENT FACILITY!! THEY make/made the choice!
So why are our court challengers telling us WE OWE THEM (the illegals) $450K for child separation damages? We didn't force them to be separated, they chose to be separated rather than go back across to Mexico, even as Mexico was ALSO offering them asylum. Those migrants (the legal term is illegal) could have taken asylum in Mexico, and indeed SHOULD have taken asylum in THE FIRST COUNTRY THEY ENTERED after leaving their original home country. They only chose to come to the US border because they decided that the economic advantage here was better than Mexico. SO-o-o-o-o, WE are being taken advantage of once again, just because the migrants want to try to get more money for themselves, EVEN when it meant that their children would be separated. It appears that the money issue is of the utmost importance to them, not the well-being of their kids!
What the courts have to fall back on is the agreement that President Clinton made back in the nineties, that determined the children could not stay by their parents sides, once those parents illegally entered our country and our state, forcing the US to put them in jail. If they had entered at a port-of-entry, their children would have been boarded WITH them at a facility, thus, no forced separation.
Seems to me that the US is NOT responsible for separation anxiety, but rather THE PARENTS of those children are responsible for WHAT THEY CHOSE TO DO BY THEIR BREAKING OUR LAW OF PROPER ENTRY. Since they were counseled incorrectly by shysters, they entered illegally and had to face incarceration, after they chose not to turn around.
Bob D.,
Shouldn't this case go to court and have our laws be brought to light so that every citizen can clearly see that the parents are to blame for the choices made? And also, shouldn't the fact be brought up that these parents should actually have sought asylum in Mexico, not the United States? There was no true need for them to have sought asylum here. They would have been better off to have stayed in Mexico where they shared the same language and customs, etc.
|