Message Forum

Welcome to the Richardson High School Message Forum.

The Message Forum is an ongoing dialogue among classmates. The goal is to encourage friendly interaction, including interaction among classmates who really didn't know each other. Experience on the site has revealed that certain topics tend to cause friction and hard feelings, especially politics and religion. 

Although politics and religion are not completely off-limits, classmates are asked to be positive in their posts and not to be too repetitive or allow a dialog to degenerate into an argument. 

Forums work when people participate - so don't be bashful! Click the "Post Response" button to add your entry to the forum.


 
go to bottom 
  Post Message
  
    Prior Page
 Page  
Next Page      

04/05/23 06:41 PM #27200    

 

Janalu Jeanes (Parchman)

Lowell,

You mentioned a while back that you picked up your newspapers there, and when you did, I knew exactly what laundromat you were talking about.  Before the grocery store became L and S, it had a name of Rieff's or Reiff's.  It probably had several names over the years.  It was a store that always had fryers on sale on certain days, where housewives could buy numerous chickens at once.  Mrs. Campbell, Barbara Campbell's mom, would go there for chickens on sale days to stock up her freezer, informing my Mom to go there too, to get good deals.  My Mom didn't like to grocery shop early when the stores opened, preferring to go to Kroger's about once a week to get lots of stuff for us chow hounds, in the afternoons. She used to drive up in our garage with about 14-15 bags of goodies, and she would instruct Jill and me to please bring it all in and put it away, while she got dinner started, so my Dad wouldn't get mad over tardiness.  He wanted to eat soon as he got home from work, about 6 PM, with a growling tummy in tow.  My Mom said she didn't have time to mess with the ads and sales, so she just went for groceries when she finished the morning laundry and her favorite book club get-togethers. She had a set schedule and was set in her ways, pretty much.  It used to take a long time to put away those darn groceries, keeping my sister and me away from watching Band Stand, or Sumpn' Else!  Aurgh-h-h-h!  


04/05/23 07:06 PM #27201    

 

Lowell Tuttle

I had a comment about digital money.   

You know, a 50.00 bill is a 50.00 bill thousands of times.   

A 50.00 debit or credit card is 49.00 then 48.00 then 47.00 then 46.00 then 45.00 and so on...because of charges to the selling entity...(if not more of a charge per trransaction...)

I prefer cash    Event checks have an expense associated due to the accounting costs...

 


04/05/23 07:42 PM #27202    

Jim Bedwell

Lady Lanajuju,

No, I haven't seen that toilet commercial, but I have developed the same kind of relationship with my toilet at night lately!!

When my dad had his next-to-last job transfer and was living in the greater Chicago area in the mid-70's, my brother and I stopped by my (1st cousin, 5x removed or 4th cousin, 4x removed, depending on which theory you buy into concerning Nancy Hanks's ancestry) cousin Abe Lincoln's house in Springfield, Illinois. The tour guide showed us the chamber pot he used. My brother asked what that was for!!!! hahahahaha!!! Makes you long for the good ol' days, huh?

No, I haven't seen a bluegrass act yet here. I like bluegrass but don't own much music of that genre. I'm much more into blues music, especially guitar blues, more especially electric guitar blues, most especially virtuoso electric guitar blues.

I drove about 50 miles along the Blue Ridge Highway in 1976, not recently. I don't feel the need to do that.

By the way, our Strategic Petroleum Reserve has now dropped to about 371 billion barrels of oil, down from over 700 billiion under the EVIL ORANGE MAN and the lowest level in about 40 years.

Also many countries are now dropping our dollar as the world's standard money currency. As always, including Afghanistan, (reaction or lack thereof to) East Palestine, Ohio, gas prices, stagflation, trillions in new debt, CONSTANT LYING, ad nauseum thanks a lot, Joe, the VERY WORST Prez ever, far worse than even Obama (my half 17th cousin), Jimmy Carter (my 11th cousin, 1x removed - we descend from the same Carter immigrant), Woodrow Wilson (I'm related to both of his wives, but not to him), James Buchanan (no relation) and FDR (10th cousin, 3x removed), all Dems and all certainly in my top 10 of WORST Presidents. S(ituation) N(ormal) A(ll) F(ouled) U(p). Oh and the new black mayor of Chicago is allegedly even further to the left (wants to defund the police) and thus may be even worse than ex-mayor Lori "Lightweight" Lightfoot - he recently badmouthed white people a lot - obviously a real racist as opposed to we faux racists. And HOW DARE you, Tommy & others talk about White's Auto, all you obvious white supremacists!

Oh, just heard on Tucker Carlson that the Cash App founder (whatever the Cash App is) was just stabbed to death on the street in San Francisco. Thanks, Dems. And I'm now calling for a nationwide confiscation of ALL knives EVERYWHERE.

And don't you ever bring up the subject of Soros-funded Manhattan DA Alvin Braggaduncio to me!!

Chief Jimi Bob


04/06/23 12:59 PM #27203    

 

Bob Davidson

Tommy,

I was thinking about you saying that you "like" Liz Warren.  She is a public figure, a political celebrity, so to speak, and I strongly suspect that you do not know her, and probably have never even met her.  By "like" her, I take it that you agree with her politically (as your posts indicate) and therefore believe that you like her.  If someone doesn't agree with her political positions, he or she is likely to indicate that they do not "like" her. 

Because the senator is a public figure, with her personal life mixed into the public consciousness, she has placed herself into a position where people are going to have an opinion about her personal actions, like any other celebrity.  I don't know what, if any, political opinions any of the Kardashians profess, but I have the opinion that they are trashy jerks based on their public image and believe that I am free to say that I don't like them.  If you admire their style or behavior, you have no right to be offended by my dislike. 

I agree with most of Trump's policy actions, disagree with a few, and don't particularly like his public persona.  I disagree with almost all of Biden's policy actions and think he is and has always been a dispicable human being.  I agreed with a lot of Mitt Romney's policy proposals, voted for him once, and think he is a disloyal creep personally and so on.  I have no right to be offended if you disagree with any of my opinions:  I may think you are wrong, but that is not personal unless you make it personal, such as by branding my opinions as evil or immoral.  

I'm sure you are familiar with the Overton Window concept.  I see the anti-conservative establishment types as trying to trick us by defining any policy that isn't the same as theirs as being outside the acceptable range of ideas.  When someone does that, the object of the manipulation has every right to be outraged by the unfairness.

Those things get mixed up easily; I was once at a party with some of my neighbors, back during the Clinton administration.  I had just read a book I liked very much comparing FDR and Bill as leaders.  A group of us men were standing around the outside grill talking about Clinton, and I brought up the idea that FDR considered himself to be someone with a "second-rate mind surrounding himself with first-rate minds,"  as opposed to Clinton who always wanted to be the smartest person in the room.  I brought up their respective cabinets and got everyone laughing about my philosopher brother-in-law's comment when watching Clinton's cabinet meet -- "Oh boy, the circus is in town." 

As I was elaborating, letting my inner reaconteur run a little wild, everyone started laughing including the host.  Our host's wife saw us laughing and came over, just in time to hear me describe Lord Benson as the ringmaster of a troupe including an Amazon half woman, a midget, and so on.  This woman was at the time the president of our kid's school PTO and a bit humorless.  She later became a Houston ISD School Board member and a fairly prominent Houston City Council Member.  Instead of joining in the laughter, she told me angrily that my mockery of her brother-in-law was not appreciated and inappropriate.  I didn't know who her brother-in-law was, and I didn't have any idea that I'd mocked any real person, only Clinton and his henchmen, so I asked her who she was talking about. She snarled, "The Secretary of HUD is Tim's brother Henry."  She stormed off as I was apologizing, probably to tell all the liberal women what a disrespectful little shit I was.  Tim, however, said he was going to tell his brother, for a laugh.  I, of course, would never have said those things if I'd realized that my neighbor was a close relative of a famous politician.

As I'm writing this, it occurred to me that Liz and her fake Indian ancestry is the root of what's making you feel insulted.  Since you only partake of the establishment propaganda outlets, you probably think that Liz Warren is an authentic fellow part-Cherokee.  The reality is that she has a history of faking her heritage, like, say, Ward Churchill and Rachel Dolezal:  she parlayed a false claim of Native American ancestry to go from a non-tenure track teaching position at UT to tenured professorships in the Ivy League, first at Penn, then Harvard. Both law schools boasted of her as Native American.  When she ran for President in 2000, she took a DNA test to prove her ancestry:  it came out way, way less than 1% Native American. Anyone who knows this has a very good reason not to like her. (Even a simple Google search will show you these facts.)

It also occurred to me that I may be the only person on this board who has had a personal acquaintence with Senator Warren.  I knew her when she was a hot young professor at the University of Houston Law Center (with dark brown hair) and I was yet another beaten into the ground law student.  In those days, forty plus years ago, she was the only outspokenly conservative Republican faculty member.  I was fresh off a stint as president of the UT Shuttle Bus Drivers' Union and still had the unfortunate Austin mindset.  Every Thursday evening, the student bar association sponsored an "arbitration" on the roof of the library: they bought a keg of beer and cups and invited the faculty to hang out with the students for an hour or so.  Professor Warren and I got in the habit of arguing politics to the amusement of the rest of the crowd -- we were both a little out of the mainstream of law students (they were mostly moderates of one party or the other but they seemingly enjoyed our recreational arguing). 

I don't think she took me personally:  her best friend on the faculty was Gene Smith, an old-school Texas liberal who liked to tell the story about how he was responsible for John Tower going into politics:  he flunked Tower when he taught at SMU.  He'd add that Tower was plenty smart, just not interested in the law. (If you want another reason to think ill of Warren, after he died, she claimed that poor Eugene was a sexual aggressor who chased her around his desk when she was a poor little professorette -- that is an obvious blatant lie:  Eugene Smith could barely walk with arm crutches because he's had a bout of polio way back when and Warren was a fit young woman);  When we encountered one another she treated me like she liked me -- of course she is a politician so who knows. 

She left U of H to take a non-tenure track job at UT becasue her husband was working in Austin and she wanted to be with him.  She wasn't an Indian yet.

My point is that I liked Liz Warren personally but do not approve of some of her actions.  If you started insulting her personally because she advocated a policy you disagreed with, i could answer based on having known her.  If we were still friends, I could have grounds to be insulted. 

Sorry for the rambling -- I guess I'm really getting old.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


04/06/23 03:05 PM #27204    

Jim Bedwell

Bob D,

So Elizabeth Warren was a CONSERVATIVE faculty member when you knew her? And your legacy Austin thinking means you were likely a liberal? My, how time changes us!

Also, yes, Warren faked her way as an American Indian, acting like she was substantially more Indian than she is, as she worked the system to gain personal advantages she didn't deserve.

And, yes, her blood test revealed that her DNA is 0.1% SOUTH American Indian, NOT ANY North American Indian. But she IS Native American, to the tune of 1/1024 IF the DNA test reveals her true percentage. My DNA test also indicated 0.2% NORTH American Indian (Cherokee), but your DNA test can over- or under-represent your ethnic ancestries since in that crapshoot process called conception, you get half of your genes from each parent, as you well know. I am actually 0.4% Cherokee  since my most recent Indian ancestor is my 6-greats grandparent (so 100%), which means I'm 1/256 Cherokee - so, like Elizabeth Warren, I really don't have any reasonable claim that I am substantially or mostly Indian either.

By the way Crooked Hillary (as you likely know, Jesse Watters of FNC usually just refers to her as "Crooked" now with no further name info), if you didn't know, in her freshman year 1965-66 at Wellesley College was President of the Young Republicans student club there!!!!


04/06/23 04:37 PM #27205    

 

Janalu Jeanes (Parchman)

Bob,

 I'm wondering what you think of the transgendered males competing against females in sports that are supposed to be for females only.  Couldn't there be Mens Sports, Womens Sports, and Trans Sports categories in all states?

Also, do you see great danger ahead for AI inventions, even if governments SAY "We will proceed cautiously"?


04/07/23 09:59 AM #27206    

 

Lowell Tuttle

Why would anyone as smart as Clarence Thomas act so negligently, obviously hiding misconducted gifts, trips and favors from a large GOP donor who claims to have had not cases in front of the court, as if he might not have one involving himself or one of his friends in the future.

I guess he is not very smart.

So now there's going to be some kind of spin on the ethics of courit members...  I wonder how that's going to work out....

Delayed until after 2024 most likely, with recusals ad infinitum.


04/07/23 01:33 PM #27207    

 

Janalu Jeanes (Parchman)

Tommy,

I agree with you that establishing a catagory in sports for transgendered participants is ridiculous, but I also think it is ridiculous to allow transgendered men to participate in women's sports with the accepted idea that these newly altered persons are physically equal to women's bodies participating alongside.  We all know that this new practice is totally wrong to inflict upon the women participants.  Seems to me it is 'flat out cheating.'  So, it occurred to me that a separate category might need to be developed to avoid the cheating aspect inflicted upon the women.  All women's sports need to be protected from these "newly created men," in my opinion, since in our new world order, these unusual women want to flaunt their new identities in a rather malicious way....seems to me.  And I've read that Caitlyn Jenner agrees with me on the issue of transgendered men entering women's sports; unfair to the women.

Lowell,

I read about the accusations toward Justice Thomas, and can't believe that this issue is serious, as has been reported.

Since when is it a problem for wealthy people to invite people with whom they enjoy friendly associations, to join them in their travels along with others they equally enjoy?  It's assumed that the rich person is "subsidizing" his friends' lives?  Really? The rich person in this particular instance, is simply allowing friends to join him on his yacht, on his private jet, at his resort in the Adirondacks, expecting nothing in return.  To imply that the wealthy person is "up to something sinister," is pure speculation and an invasion of privacy....in my opinion.

Other opinions are welcome, of course.


04/07/23 03:29 PM #27208    

 

Janalu Jeanes (Parchman)

Tommy,

I was reading from Forbes websight that Harlan Crow was not asking for or receiving any political favors from Thomas, in the twenty or so years that he has been having his friends join him on his travels.  Now I know, even with my naivete, that you and others will not believe Crow's statement, but I've witnessed 'bird's of a feather, stick together' and they associate with each other socially all the time.  I do the same thing.  I gather with friends who share my ideas, even some of those who go to my church, or those folks I knew from our days of going to football games together as parents.  To say that Thomas was influenced enough to take people's pay-offs, is to say that he is an ignorant man of the laws by which he abides. 

I'm sure that the opposing party will try to say that Thomas could in no way avoid influence, but I can say that he is of a caliber of ethics whereby he 'does the right thing, even when no one is watching.'  He is a righteous man who knows that he is always being watched......always.


04/07/23 06:07 PM #27209    

 

Janalu Jeanes (Parchman)

I told you of how the WEF was scheming a while back, and trying to push global control on the whole world, don't you remember?  I said whole neighborhoods were being bought up with Blackrock employees having billions to gain control of these neighborhoods, in their effort to help the WEF megolomanics force their control on unsuspecting ordinary folks who haven't heard of what's coming down the pike.  The slogan, "You will own nothing and you will be happy," is one of their favorites, along with Joe Biden's slogan of "Build Back Better!"

The "Build Back Better" slogan was absconded by Biden's handlers, from WEF, probably at the urging of John Kerry, Bill Gates, Soros, Mr. Fink of Blackrock, the Bank of America president, and many other corp. Big Wigs, Chinese investors, Mark Zuckerberg, Prince Charles (or King, actually) etc., who travel to Switzerland about once a year, to continue reporting of their efforts regarding climate change, sustainability, diversity, equity, 15 minute town concepts, etc.  Their big push came as the pandemic was drawing to a close, as they felt it was the optimum time to snare a vulnerable population enveloped in trying to recover.  They call their program The Great Reset.

When I told you and other folks what I had gleaned, they scoffed at me and asked me where I had gotten the information.  When I told them I had read a certain book written by a well-known conservative American man, they told me he was a nutcase, too conservative in his religious beliefs, and to go to legitimate info websites.  I told them he wrote a fast-selling book that was listed on the NYT best seller list, but they still didn't believe that my info was true. I tried to tell them that his info was held in high regard from other conservatives, as well.  They had not heard of the WEF, nor of Klaus Schwab, and they had not heard that Blackrock was using money in a questionable manner, as fiduciary investors, dealing with American citizens' retirement funds, pushing the monies in "Green climate change funds, etc.," that he and the WEF are promoting, even though these funds are not allowing the retirement fund owners to get the best bang for their bucks. Several US states have gotten wind of Blackrock's dealings, and have told Blackrock that they no longer want to do state business with them. 

Also, the WEF wants our currency to go completely digital, with one central bank in control within a fast paced revision, because then the government heads will know exactly what every person has, and where every person spends his money. (Hard to believe that this in on the way to our country, but it is true.)  I believe our Congress is looking into this banking issue and wants to avoid having our privacy eliminated, of course.  I hope they can stop all of the digital ramifications coming, but it will be a big fight.  If I understand all the worries.of people I've heard speak, on this very topic, like Monica Crowley, it is a major issue on the horizon very soon.  Some wise folks are predicting that the whole digital control is not going to be stopped easily.  I know I don't want anyone controlling in any way, the money I have.  I feel my money is my private asset that I want to keep only to myself, and most people I've talked to say the same thing.  But WEF wants to be legally into everyone's business in the very near future. They don't want citizens using cars much at all, either, not even electric cars.  They want everyone to use public transportation, or just "hoof it" in our newly dveloped 15 minute towns, or use bicycles.  They look to the Chinese model of life as quite nice and proper.  Look it up if you've never heard about this type of town. ( a 15 minute town.) 

 


04/07/23 06:11 PM #27210    

 

Wayne Gary

Russ Stoval,

My mother passed away yesterday.  When we clean out her room it will mean there are 2 rooms available in te Ryoal Pl location.  My mother was in the master bedroom of the house. 


04/07/23 06:28 PM #27211    

 

David Cordell

Very sorry to learn of the loss of your mother, Wayne.


04/07/23 06:35 PM #27212    

 

Wayne Gary

David,

Thanks.  She had a good life and was 101.  She starded having demincia about 8 years and slowy went down.


04/07/23 10:04 PM #27213    

 

Janalu Jeanes (Parchman)

Wayne,

What a wonderfully long life your Mother lived.  I think that is a magnificent achievement for her and you.  Hope all of her days were enjoyable and fruitful for her.  I can tell she was a good woman in many  ways, from the way you speak of her, and by the nice fella' you have become, as her son.


04/08/23 07:47 AM #27214    

 

Sandra Spieker (Ringo)

Wayne,

Sorry you lost your mother yesterday.  I hope her passing was peaceful and your memories of her keep you comforted.  My thoughts are with you.

 


04/08/23 01:52 PM #27215    

 

Russ Stovall

Wayne;      
So sorry to here about your mom.  What an amazing life of 101 yrs   That is amazing   Thanks for the info   

 


04/09/23 08:15 AM #27216    

 

Lowell Tuttle

Aggies.   Sam Bennett, A & M golfer from Madisonville.   Playing in the Masters.  In 3rd, 6 under in round three so far...he is playing with the best.

Verne Lundquist announcing on 16....Who remembers him on Bowling for Dollars on WFAA TV...?


04/09/23 03:13 PM #27217    

 

Jerry May

Just saw "On a Wing and a Prayer"

and this plays in it:




04/11/23 09:24 AM #27218    

 

Lowell Tuttle

If I drank beer anymore, I wouldn't drink a Bud or a Bud Light.   

But, I might be influenced enough now...

What a marketing....."muff."


04/11/23 11:16 AM #27219    

 

Ron Knight

Thanks Tommy for the birthday wishes!!! 

And Happy Birthday to Bill Sieling, Jean Richards, Sandra and whoever else I may have missed!!


04/11/23 11:36 PM #27220    

 

Steve Keene

David,  

How are you, Gimp!?  I could not email you a picture so I sent one to Hollis to post.


04/12/23 07:07 AM #27221    

 

David Cordell

Steve,

Thanks for asking. 

I think my three broken vertegrae transverse processes are healing pretty well. I can sit and walk without pain -- just minor discomfort. Some movements that involve even a slight amount of twisting cause a very sharp stabbing pain, but it dissipates quickly.. I still have to get out of chairs very carefully, but no big feal. Could be a lot worse!

Now my real pain is my insurance bill. I think they are calling me "at fault" so my auto rates will be surcharged for three years, but that won't start until November. However, I just received my auto insurance bill (that doesn't include the surcharge) and it went up by 51%.  I also just received my home insurance bill, and it went up by 18%.

So, my annual insurance bill is going up by more than $1,000, and that's before the surcharge.

Ouch! 


04/13/23 09:29 AM #27222    

 

Steve Keene

Tommy,

This is a prime example of what is wrong with you.  You have been given the keeper of the keys for a very interesting and entertaining story by Bob Fleming and yet you string it out over multiple days in installments.  I guess it is to use as a punishment for they way you percieve you have been treated or to extend your authority in a selfish manner.  

Yet, it is nothing for you to print pages of diatribe as you did earlier this month to chastise your "friends" in their choice of religion, politics or lifestyle.  You are a narcissist and a control freak and this latest escapade of yours is clinical proof.


04/13/23 10:00 AM #27223    

 

David Cordell

I first saw Martha Salter at her sorority's casual on November 8, 1971. The next time I saw her was in early April at her sorority's formal. But I didn't actually meet her until April 13, 1972, fifty-one years ago today.

So far, so good!

 

 

 

 

  


04/13/23 10:33 AM #27224    

Jim Bedwell

Chief Right On,

THANK YOU for your post about Tommy. 'Nuf said.

Chief Left the Left


go to top 
  Post Message
  
    Prior Page
 Page  
Next Page