Sandra Spieker (Ringo)
Janalu, You stated:
I think your assessment about the phrase "assigned at birth" is correct.
There have been babies born who have had both female sexual organs as well as male organs, so that presents a problem for doctors and parents to determine.
There also have been babies born who are anatomically confused, or underdeveloped. I'm pretty sure they are given unique designations determined by the medical staff. Those occurrences are rare.
My response are in purple:
I agree with you on this Janalu, I think instances of this are very rare. However, what I have learned about this is the doctor informs the parents that the child either has deformed genitals, or mixed (part of both). Then the parents decide how to proceed from there. Often a sex is designated (a decision based on the doctors’ recommendation and the parents’ preference) and then surgery to fix the genitals to conform to that decision is done. Time will tell if the kid grows up and feels the same way later on in life. It is probably a 50/50 chance they will get it right. These kids may end up content or confused and tortured depending upon the outcome. Bottom line is I doubt that a birth certificate has a check box for both, or neither. I could be wrong. Someone please show me a birth certificate that has this designation if I am mistaken. Then there is brain chemistry that comes into play as well. Your brain is influenced by hormones and your chromosomes. This in my opinion is why some people feel they are female when they appear as male, or vice versa. Or perhaps why some come to realize they are homosexual, for the same reason. This is more than a state of mind or belief, I believe it is part of the brains’ chemical/hormonal makeup.
Your next statement, this one below, puzzles me:
What to me is unbelievable, is a doctor who says, "We place the baby in a comfortable crib, and decide what to do with the baby." WHAT?
Such admissions as that are SO cruel, abhorant and evil, the way I see it. Why wouldn't a woman who doesn't want the baby, simply allow the hospital to place the child in an adoption agency for adoption?
Seems so logical and decent and loving, especially for the baby.
Where did you see this or hear this? I have never heard of this. I think if the baby was born in any American hospital with competent staff adhering to the Hippocratic oath, they would not even consider such a situation. Most infants are put in a small crib to assess right after birth, and then handed over to the mother to hold. In my case, my son was handed over to me almost immediately after he was born. If the mother does not want the child, then it is cared for and put up for adoption. All she need do is sign the paper or announce she does not want it at all and the nurses in the nursery will feed it and cuddle with it or a volunteer will. If you have any proof of this, please supply me with a link, I am very curious.
|